Essential Reference Resource for Exegesis †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Essential Reference Resource for Exegesis. Answer: Introduction: The Bible is written by human beings to record their experiences of getting association of Jesus Christ, or expressing their firsthand accounts. Therefore, it is very comprehensible and possible that there are discrepancies and problems in the Bible. There are different accounts which are of conflicting nature and those which do not match with the accounts of each other (Robertson 2014). The death of Judas has been explained differently in Matthew 27:3 and Acts 1:18. In the first account the person had killed himself by hanging however in the second account the person died by an explosion happening inside his body. In Matthew there was one angel a young man sitting down. However, Luke has portrayed that two men stood by a women and proclaimed resurrection. About the Baptism of Jesus, Matthew and Luke has slightly different way of narration. Also in the narration of Mark and John there was difference of opinion about the time when Jesus was crucified. Therefore, it is to be understood that the various people who had presented the accounts of Jesus were human beings, therefore there can be slight difference in their understandings. The three synoptic Gospels, Matthew, Mark, and Luke give a vivid description about the life and teachings of Jesus. The three Gospel writers have described the life of Jesus according to their own capabilities and perspectives. The differences of version in the three Gospels have been studied vividly by the Biblical Scholars, some are of the opinion that these cannot be harmonized by the present thinkers and scholars (Schrter and Coppins 2013). Also there are differences in versions of creation, for example GE 1:3-5 On the first day, God created light, then separated light and darkness. GE 1:14-19 The sun (which separates night and day) wasn't created until the fourth day. The human limitations must be given due consideration as explanation to the differences in these accounts. Greetings of the day. I hope this finds you in good health. You had posed your query about whether there are discrepancies and errors in the new Testament. This is in regards to the fact there are different versions of particular events in various Biblical sources. Therefore, you are unsure about the authenticity of the Biblical texts. The answer to this is, there are no errors in the new testament, however there are certain differences of opinion about nature of certain incidents in the Biblical texts. The meaning of this can be explained by stating that the Biblical texts are composed by human beings, who have detailed their own experiences and accounts they have come across, related to Jesus. Therefore, there are some differences in their opinion according to their perception but there are no errors. If the different scriptures are studied carefully it would be found apart from very minor differences most of them describes the life of Jesus accurately. The life of Jesus is to inspire the human kind to follow the path of righteousness and morality. Herod the Great was lived a little before Jesus was born, and he was himself half Jewish as he adopted Jewish lifestyle. The person in order to impress the Roman monarchs started building many architectural wonders including religious centers using Greco-Roman architecture. Most of the architecture were temples which were grand and huge. All these were mainly aimed at pleasing the Roman royals, these did not have any spiritual significance. He also had the objective of bringing more tourists to Jerusalem to increase the wealth, hence he built spectacular architecture. In his vision Jerusalem would be one of the grandest cities which would attract tourists from all over Europe. He did not tolerate any kind of dissent or opposition and killed a number of his wives and sons. Any opposition to his theories were dealt with execution. His kingdom was divided into three parts among his three sons after his death. The three sons who luckily survived from the wrath of their father ruled three separate parts of the kingdom. The idea of God and religion in the Jews philosophy was completely different from what the Romans followed. The Romans had their own deities and several Gods. This was in stark contrast with the Jews idea of 1 God received from the 10 commandments. Therefore, the two ideas often clashed, and though the Romans made concessions to the Jews to come in their country and stay. However, the Jews in order to establish their philosophy of one God often had debates with the Romans in order to convince them of the sin of believing in multiple Gods. The culture and the belief systems of both the communities clashed against each other and this was before the Christian era. The Jews had migrated to Rome from Israel, and in the new place they thrived and became a part of the new land. Judea was administered by Roman general and later on the land was divided into 5 administrative districts. The main point of clash between the two people were the belief system about God. The pagan religions were condemned by the Jews on the ground of their teaching of Moses, who gave them the 10 commandments and one of the main point of conflict was the one true God or the various Gods and Goddesses. Gospel in Christianity is actually the good news and message from Christ. Gospel is the entire of the saving truth as God has passed on it to lost humankind as it is revealed in the person of His Son and in the Holy Scriptures, the Bible. In the Greek New Testament, gospel is the elucidation of the Greek thing euangelion inspiring news, and the verb euangelizo, connoting to bring or report elevating news. Both words are gotten from the angelos, "messenger." In set up Greek, a euangelos was one who brought a message of triumph or other political or individual news that caused joy. That both the thing and the verb are used so comprehensively in the New Testament display how it developed an especially Christian use and highlight because of the brilliant news announced to humankind of salvation and triumph over transgression and passing that God offers to all people through the individual and accomplished work of Jesus Christ on the cross as showed by His reclamation, rising, and session at God's right hand. The four gospels of the New Testament Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are the essential wellspring of information on the life of Jesus. For various reasons introduce day scientists are aware of relying upon them uncritically, yet regardless they do give a keen idea of individuals who were followers and about Jesus himself. The Gospel writers each had their symbols which represented them and their writings and these are known as synoptic Gospels as these contains many same stories. These four Gospel writers are represented as four creatures in various portraits of that era, and they are shown to draw the chariot of God. These four animals are represented as four aspects, like the man as the king of creator, the lion as the king of meat eating, the ox as the king of grass eating, and the eagle as the king of birds. Matthew is symbolized by the man with wings, Mark is represented as Lion with wings, Luke is represented as Ox with wings, John is represented as eagle. In the early Gospel books the four Gospel writers are most of the time represented as the four symbolic animals. The four symbolic animals are placed in four cardinal corners of Jesus Christ. Taylor Herverson states Ancient biography (or a modified form of ancient biography) is the literary type in which these writings were cast by the gospel writers. For more than a century biblical scholars disagreed about the literary style of the gospels. But recently there has been growing and wide acceptance that the gospels are ancient biographies. Rev. Professor Richard A. Burridge's bookWhat are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biographyis a major factor in this new understanding (Burridge 2004). The difference between the ancient and modern biographies is in the modern biographies the authors have focused on the changing nature of a mans character and their character development over time. However, in the ancient biographies emphasis has been given on the unchanging character of a person and the high moral grounds on which his or her character is built. Hence I agree with the statement that the Gospels have similarities with the ancient biographies. The character of Jesus is unchanging, he has been equally holy and moral throughout the narrative and as the Son of God he has been placed on the high stage of morality and righteousness. The Gospel writers of Jesus has glorified him as the Messiah and the Gods sent messenger who came to deliver the human kind from their sinful activities. In the verses Mark 4:35 to 4:41, the incident of Jesus calming the wind and the waves of the deep sea is described. The incident which is described in these verses indicate the situation when Jesus had been visiting the sea with some of his disciples on the boat. Soon it was found that large waves were coming and the winds turned very violent. The disciples who were accompanying Jesus were terrified of the sudden turn of incidents. Jesus was lying down on a cushion, and the disciples woke him up in a very afraid tone, the boat would capsize if the situation would prevail. When Jesus woke up he said that the disciples should keep faith and that he was there for them, he calmed the wind down and also the waves were not anymore there. The disciples were in a shock that how Jesus controlled the natural forces. This incident was similar to Moses controlling the ocean. Therefore, the Gospel writers had stated similar incidents like the incidents of the Old Testament (Clements 2012). As Jesus had calmed the storm he is also having the capability to calm the storm of the minds and life of the people who take shelter in him. He is the controller of the natural forces and also the controller of the lives of the people around him. If truly someone takes shelter unto him they will get his protection from the storm of life. The first readers would understand that Jesus is having super natural powers to control the natural forces. Jesus is described as the Son of God in the Biblical texts. Therefore, it is natural that he would be imbibed with powers that are not present in the normal people. He had his abilities to perform miracles. The natural forces used to obey him, and this was repeated several times in many incidents. The Gospels written by the three Gospel writers Matthew, Mark, and Luke are often called as the Synoptic Gospels. The reason of calling them by that name is, they contain many similar incidents and similar narrations about Jesus Christ. The sequences are also similar and the language in which the incidents are expressed are also similar in many ways. Therefore, these Gospels are known as the Synoptic Gospels. The term is derived from the Latin Word Synopsis, which means see all together, in English which can be expressed as looking from the same point of view. The similarity is sometimes intermittently broken by the appearance of incidents that are differently expressed in the Gospels. However overall presentation of the incidents has been similar, and the point of view of looking at the incidents, are also similar. They have all expressed Jesus as the Son of God, and the one who appeared to0 deliver the sinful human kind. The four source hypothesis was developed by Burnett Hillman Streeter in 1924. In this theory it was proposed by that Luke had sourced his matters which did not appear in Marks Gospel from at least two sources which can be stated as Q and L. Matthew also used a source which was distinctive and may be portrayed as M, and he sourced from Q as well. Now it after analysis it can be known that Luke did not come across the source M, and Matthew did not know about the source L. The M source suggests an origin from Jerusalem, whereas the source L is consigned to Caesarea and Q has been seen to be related to Antioch. This is the four source theory as a whole. The view also suggests that the Gospel that came first is the results of traditions of Jerusalem, Antioch and Rome. The theory suggests that the birth narratives and the materials from Mark was added later. The Synoptic problem is the problem of specific relationship between the three Synoptic gospels, and it is based on the enquiries about, which gospel was written when and what are the sources on which they depended when they were composed. The narration of the three synoptic Gospels are very similar, in their tone, in their quotations, and the way they have stated the events during the life of Jesus. The Gospel of Mark may have been the oldest Gospel which was composed, and the later gospels took material from the oldest one. The Lukes Gospel was composed somewhere around 80 AD. The Matthews Gospel was also written at a similar time. The Gospel of Matthew was primarily written for the Jews audience, whereas the Gospel of Luke was composed mainly targeted at the Gentile audience. Matthew had written his the gospel of Matthew was to mainly persuade the Jews that Jesus Christ was the Messiah who was predicted in the Old Testaments. The Gospel was written with a view point that the Jewish audience needs to be convinced about the mission of Jesus Christ. It is often also termed as the Gospel of the Jews. There was no need to explain the prevailing Jewish tradition to the readers by the Gospel, as it is intended for the Jewish audience only. The book has Jesus saying "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel", and also "Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel", therefore the very evident Jewish characteristic of this particular Gospel explains its purpose of being composed for the Jews audience. The Gospel of Luke was purposed for the Gentiles, or the non-Jews. In Mark's gospel, Jesus' first open act is an expulsion (1:23-28). Luke utilizes Mark as his principle source, however he makes Jesus' first open act a sermon (4:16-30). This address originates from Mark (6:1-6), yet Luke relocates it to the start of his gospel (in Mark it happens considerably well along in the story, afterward Jesus has played out various wonders, has ensnared himself in contentions with adversaries, and talked in anecdotes). Unmistakably, this is a deliberate proceed onward Luke's part, and more likely than not been done on the grounds that he needed to feature certain subjects. Precisely contrast Lk 4:16-30 and Mk 6:1-6 to acknowledge how Luke has changed the story. In Luke 4:16-30, the creator clarifies that this specific scene of Jesus' address happens in the place where he grew up of Nazareth, setting up his dismissal from his own kin as significantly all the more stunning and rather sudden (the rejected prophet). Notwithstanding just starting his own gospel with Jesus' discourse, Luke chooses to stretch the plot to an entire 15 verses, when contrasted with Mark's insignificant 5. In his discourse inside the good news of Luke, Jesus peruses specifically from a parchment expressing that The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. In Johns own words Jesus performed many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are recorded in this book. But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah.. While a considerable lot of Jesus' signs were done within the sight of others, the nearness of his pupils is the vital certainty, for it is they who have accepted and been empowered to, by the Spirit, comprehend their centrality and give testimony regarding Jesus and Jesus' observer to the Father. The purpose of John was to mainly instate Jesus as the eternal Soon of God. John's motivation is unequivocally to authorize others to come across the holiness that Jesus has quite recently communicated about, which comes through confidence. The two principal designations for Jesus are Christ and Son of God. The reason (or result; hina can mean either) of this accepting is to have life in his name. The Gospel of John excludes a lot of matter found in the synoptic Gospels, with some shockingly vital scenes: the allurement of Jesus, Jesus' transfiguration, and the establishment of the Lord's dinner are not specified by John. John says no cases of Jesus throwing out evil presences. The Sermon on the Mount and the Lord's petition are not seen in the Fourth Gospel. There are no story illustrations in John's Gospel (most researchers don't respect John 15:1-8 as an anecdote in the strict sense). John likewise incorporates a lot of matter not found in the synoptics. All the matter in John 24, Jesus' initial Galilean service, isn't found in the synoptics. Earlier visits of Jesus to Jerusalem before the energy week are specified in John however not found in the synoptics. The seventh sign-marvel, the restoration of Lazarus (John 11) isn't specified in the synoptics. The broadened Farewell Discourse (John 1317) isn't seen in the succinct Gospels. John's gospel was most likely the last one composed. He was more seasoned. He had most likely been recounting his most loved Jesus stories for as long as he can remember. John recorded his record with the goal that later Christians could hear what he saw, similarly as the congregation had profited from his stories for the duration of his life. He gave an alternate, yet at the same time associated, point of view to the life and demise of Jesus. The other three Gospels are called "synoptic" Gospels, since they cooperated with a "typical view", which is the thing that succinct means. John worked independently with an alternate affair of Jesus. Versus a compelling Gnostic development, which experienced difficulty with Jesus' natural, physical nearness of the celestial, John underscored the truth of the awesome revealer in human experience: God getting to be human to reclaim us. References and Bibliography: Brown, R.E., 2015.An introduction to the New Testament. Yale University Press. Harris, M., 2017.Prepositions and Theology in the Greek New Testament: An Essential Reference Resource for Exegesis. Zondervan. Robertson, A.T., 2014.A grammar of the Greek New Testament in the light of historical research. Ravenio Books. Schrter, J. and Coppins, W., 2013.From Jesus to the New Testament: Early Christian theology and the origin of the New Testament canon. Baylor University Press. Martens, E.A., 2015.God's design: A focus on Old Testament Theology. Wipf and Stock Publishers. Clements, R.E., 2012.Old Testament theology: a fresh approach. Wipf and Stock Publishers. Moberly, R.W.L., 2013.Old Testament Theology: Reading the Hebrew Bible as Christian Scripture. Baker Academic. Wright, C.J., 2013.Old Testament ethics for the people of God. InterVarsity Press. Schrer, E., Vermes, G. and Millar, F., 2014.The history of the Jewish people in the age of Jesus Christ(Vol. 2). AC Black. Schrer, E., Vermes, G. and Millar, F., 2014.The history of the Jewish people in the age of Jesus Christ(Vol. 2). AC Black. McGrath, A.E., 2016.Christian theology: An introduction. John Wiley Sons. Burridge, R.A., 2004. What are the Gospels?: A comparison with Graeco-Roman biography. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.